Regarded by some as a form of Aylostera eos, A. colorea, or A. pygmaea, and has been the subject of

Regarded by some as a form of Aylostera eos, A. colorea, or A. pygmaea, and has been the subject of
Rebutia (Aylostera) froehlichiana was first described in Succulenta, 54:12, pp. 225-226, in 1975 by Walter Rausch. Here is the text
Misidentification and mislabelling has caused confusion with this species. Regarded by some as a form of Aylostera pygmaea, A. mamillosa,
A recent discovery, Rebutia (Aylostera) fischeriana was described in Kaktusy XXXVIII: 3, pp. 66-70, by Rudolf Slaba in 2002. I
Rebutia (Aylostera) donaldiana was described in Ashingtonia 1:7, pp. 76-78, in 1974 by Alfred Lau and Gordon Rowley. The description
A distinctive species with a very small range in Pucara, Bolivia, discovered by Alfred Lau in 1970. With a deep,
Regarded by many as a form of Aylostera atrovirens. Found to be distinctive enough to be given specific status by
Only recently described as a new species (2002). Part of the A. einsteinii group of plants at the southern edge
Aylostera (Rebutia (Digitorrebutia)) eos was originally described in Succulenta 51(2), p.2, by Walter Rausch in 1972. Here is the text
A lot of confusion exists around this often white or pale pink flowered species, with misapplied field collection numbers and
Rebutia (Aylostera) einsteinii was first described by A. V. Frič, in Möllers Deutsche Gärtner Zeitung, 63: 23, p. 267, in
One of the southernmost species, and quite variable over its range, becoming like A. aureiflora in places, to which it